A.C.’s Review: Writing
a review for this is very difficult because the film is not even worth
the time to write it but if it saves even one person from blowing a hard
earned $10.00 on an admission ticket then I can justify it. Every now
and then I go to a film where I know little or nothing about it and
usually am quite surprised and satisfied...and then there is an
experience like THE GAMBLER where I actually walk out
of the theater angry.
Where
to begin…I guess with a thumbnail sketch of the alleged plot. Mark
Wahlberg plays Jim Bennet a college professor so addicted to gambling to
the point
where he owes some very bad men hundreds of thousands of dollars and has
7 days to pay up…or else DA,DA, DUM!!!
I
can’t remember when I have ever seen such a loathsome central character
in a movie. Bennet doesn’t give a s@#t about anybody . For example he
tells his
entire lecture class of students only one of them has any true talent
(the next time we see the class almost everyone but a half dozen have
dropped his course). He has a loveless relationship with his rich mother
played by Jessica Lange (who knew she was old
enough to play Wahlberg’s mother!) He is disrespectful to everybody
including three different sets of gangsters he owes money to. Just a
complete creep with NO redeeming qualities. None.
The
glacial pace is scene after scene of him either pontificating to his
class, playing cards (thankfully one scene employs the “speeded up”
camera technique
so we don’t have to see him lose all is money in real time and just
being a general A-hole. I just hated this guy. At one point he gets
$250,000 from his rich mother only to blow it at an Indian casino
instead of paying back the Korean mobster he owes. Idiot.
At
on one occasion its even pointed out to Bennet he’s got everything
going for him, looks, position, a wealthy family…he even is a published
novelist
and still he manages to throw it all away.
What else to hate about this movie? Let’s see:
A
tacked on “Love Story” that you can’t even call it that because it
exists for only a few reasons. (It’s with one of his students and the
one he proclaims
in the class as the one who has any TRUE writing talent-she also serves
drinks at the illegal Korean casino)
*Nobody wants a movie in the 21st century whose only female role is that of the mother. She is there for eye candy…plain and simple.
*Someone
is needed for Bennet to allegedly care about (he only cares about
himself from everything presented on the screen) when the mobsters need
to threaten
someone other than himself to get the money due to them.
The
depth of this relationship seems not to rise above a one night stand
but that’s not the way its presented in what passes for a climax.
John
Goodman with second billing pops up for a total of three scenes for the
whole movie. During his second appearance he gives a speech in which
only
a person in a movie would ever speak like this. It was as if he was
aware he was in a movie. Admittedly it was a pretty good speech to
Bennet on what he should have done one time when he was a million
dollars ahead gambling.
The
only time this movie shows any sort of pulse is the last half hour when
there is an elaborate plan by Bennet that I can’t even begin to explain
here
that involves rigging the outcome of a basketball game via one of his
students who is the star of the team as a way to solve his life
threatening gambling debts.
Why
is this dreary film being dropped on the Christmas season? One reason
and one reason only. The cast and crew obviously believe it to be Oscar
Bait
and it has to be released before the end of the year to quality. Mark
Wahlberg after years of appearing in popcorn flicks like TRANSFORMERS 4
makes a stab here at being a “serious actor” in this role….bad
choice…very bad choice.
Then
there is the director…Rupert Wyatt. This guy made the stellar RISE OF
THE PLANET OF THE APES and passed on the sequel because he didn’t think
he would
have enough time to prepare. Matt Reeves director of the highly praised
DAWN OF THE PLANET OF THE APES appears to have had plenty of time and
delivered one of the year’s best movies…while Rupert ditched the sequel
to direct….this abomination.
In
conclusion I am sorry this is the first week of the year because I
can’t declare it the worst movie of the year…come next December some
film would have
to had worked mighty hard to take the crown from this dud.
Best
Scene: Didn’t take place in the movie. It was between the couple next
to me. 45 minutes in and the boyfriend wanted to bolt. His quotes were
as follows
“We should leave”. “This is going nowhere” and “ WTF” his girlfriend’s
response was “Maybe it will get better”
I
honestly didn’t think he was going to win in his bid to leave but about
15 minutes later she apparently gave in and they hustled out. They were
perhaps
the smartest people in the audience.
A.C.’s Rating: Not even on free broadcast TV because if this ever aired the channel
would get switched before the first commercial break.
Take a cue from The Gambler in the movie and use your $10 to buy
scratch off lotto tickets instead...it would be money better spent.